Rand Paul Highly Skeptical. ‘We See Repeat Data Dumps That Caused Trump To Lose 4 States’
Trump margin of ‘defeat’ in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM
Senator Rand Paul (Republican out of KY) stepped up and stated that he’s ‘highly skeptical’ about the 2020 presidential election, and its results. Paul went on to cite what he called overnight “data dumps” in 4 (four) key battleground states.
Rand Paul tweeted “Interesting . . . Trump margin of ‘defeat’ in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself.”.
Of course Twitter had to flex its Liberal muscles and labelled the post with a warning that said ‘This claim about election fraud is disputed’. Rand Paul responded by linking to a report (https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020) which investigated vote patterns in the 2020 Presidential race. The report showed:
“An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31 a.m. Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump.
An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42 a.m. Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump.
A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34 a.m. Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump.
An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50 a.m. Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump.”
The report continued “In the early hours of November 4th, 2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major ‘vote spikes’ that substantially — and decisively — improved his electoral position in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia. Much skepticism and uncertainty surrounds these ‘vote spikes’. Critics point to suspicious vote counting practices, extreme differences between the two major candidates’ vote counts, and the timing of the vote updates, among other factors, to cast doubt on the legitimacy of some of these spikes. While data analysis cannot on its own demonstrate fraud or systemic issues, it can point us to statistically anomalous cases that invite further scrutiny.”
Looks like Rand Paul is right for being skeptical. … What about YOU, what do YOU think? Please drop your comments below.